Skip to main content

Poll Violence Yet Again In Bengal!




The year 2023 witnessed a diverse range of elections taking place across India. Now, it is the turn of West Bengal, as the state prepares for the Panchayat Elections 2023, scheduled to take place on July 8.

But, West Bengal Elections are yet again tarnished by widespread violence.

Here's what you need to know!

Reported Violence in Bengal

The upcoming Panchayat Elections in West Bengal hold the fate of approximately 73,000 panchayat representatives. Unfortunately, the state has already witnessed numerous instances of violence prior to the polls.

Disturbingly, various dangerous weapons such as bombs, guns, pipes, cricket stumps, lathis (batons), and bamboo sticks have been used by both ruling and opposition parties to incite violence.


History of Poll Violence in Bengal

The outbreak of violence during the election season in Bengal was expected, given its history.

The roots of electoral violence can be traced back to the time when the Left party was in power.

Despite being in office since 2011, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's government also failed to fulfill their pledge of curbing political violence.


Deadly History of Poll Violence

The conflicts are not only limited between rival parties but happen intra-party too, some of them resulting in bloodshed & brutal deaths.

In the 2003 Panchayat Elections, 36 people were killed, or even worse, in the 2013 Panchayat Elections which saw the death of 49 people, even though the elections were held under the supervision of central forces.

Why is the violence rate so high?

The crux of the main violent acts stems from the attempts to dissuade the rival parties & their candidates from filing their nominations for Panchayat Elections.

The parties resort to the use of bomb attacks and other substantial tools of firepower to stop the rival candidates and the parties from filing for seats.

The window for the nomination filing process is also tiny, so the parties are usually in an instant to file nominations for their desired seats and their rivals are creating violent interventions in an attempt to stop them from filing their nominations.

These acts make it problematic to hold a secure and transparent mandate in West Bengal and are in blatant violation of the core principles of democracy.

Voters get intimidated & threatened

Despite the ongoing violence, voter turnout in West Bengal has remained consistently high, ranging from 72% to 75% in previous years, with occasional spikes.

However, allegations suggest that party workers, acting as self-appointed enforcers, employ tactics like threats and intimidation to ensure voters cast their ballots in favor of their respective parties. 



High Court intervened!

The Calcutta High Court has taken notice of the alarming situation in West Bengal and instructed the State Election Commission (SEC) to request central forces and install CCTV cameras to address violence and potential attacks on voting day.

The Court has specifically ordered the deployment of central forces in areas where the state police presence is insufficient.

Mamata govt challenges the HC

Tragically, four individuals lost their lives on the day of the nomination filing deadline, the day on which the high court ordered.

Mamata Banerjee led Bengal government and the State Election Commission on Saturday jointly moved the Supreme Court challenging the deployment of central forces during panchayat polls in the state, ordered by the Calcutta High Court.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

рокிро▒рок்рокாро▓் рооройிродрой் рооройродாро▓் роХроЯро╡ுро│்

рокிро▒рок்рокாро▓ роОро▓்ро▓ாро░ுроо் роЪроороо்ройு роЪொро▓்ро▓ுро╡ாроЩ்роХ . роТро░ு рооройிрод роЬீро╡ройா роЕродு роЙрог்рооை родாрой் . роЖройா роЙрог்рооைропாро╡ே роироо்роо роОро▓்ро▓ாро░ுроо் роЪроорооா рокிро▒роХ்роХுро▒ோрооாройா роЗро▓்ро▓ . And роЕродு роироо்роо роХைропிро▓ропுроо் роЗро▓்ро▓ . роТро░ு роЪிро▓ро░ுроХ்роХு ро╡ாро┤்роХ்роХைроХ்роХு родேро╡ைропாрой роОро▓்ро▓ா resources роЙроо் роЕро╡роЩ்роХ роЕрок்рокா роЕроо்рооா роХிроЯ்роЯ роЗро░ுрои்родு роХிроЯைроХ்роХுроо் like 100%. роТро░ு роЪிро▓ро░ுроХ்роХு роЕродுро▓ роХொроЮ்роЪрооா родாрой் роХிроЯைроХ்роХுроо் . роТро░ு роЪிро▓ро░ுроХ்роХு роЕрои்род роЕрок்рокா роЕроо்рооாрой்ро▒ resource роХூроЯ роХிроЯைроХ்роХாродு . роЗрок்рокுроЯி роЗро░ுроХ்роХрок்рок . роиீроЩ்роХ роЗрок்рок роЗрои்род роиிро▓ைрооை ро╡ро░ ро╡рои்родுро░ுроХ்роХீроЩ்роХройா роОро▓்ро▓ாрооே роЙроЩ்роХ efforts родாрой் . роОро╡рой் роЙроЩ்роХро│ роороЯ்роЯрооா рокேроЪுройாро▓ுроо் роородிроХ்роХாродீроЩ்роХ . роиீроЩ்роХ ропாро░ு , роЙроЩ்роХро│ாро▓ роОрой்рой рооுроЯிропுроо் роОро▓்ро▓ாрооே роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு родாрой் родெро░ிропுроо் . роЗрой்ройிроХ்роХி роЙроЩ்роХро│ роТро░ு friend ройு роЕро╡роЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு родெро░ிроЮ்роЪ роород்родро╡роЩ்роХ роХிроЯ்роЯ introduce рокрог்рог роЕроЪிроЩ்роХрок்рокроЯுро▒ро╡роЩ்роХ , роТро░ு роиாро│் " ро╣ே ! роОройроХ்роХு роЕро╡рой родெро░ிропுроо் роЕро╡рой் роОрой் close friend" ройு ро╡ெроХ்роХрооே роЗро▓்ро▓ாроо роЪொро▓்ро▒ роиாро│் ро╡ро░ாрооропா рокோропிроЯுроо் ? роЙроЩ்роХ рооேро▓ роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роироо்рокிроХ்роХை роЗро░ுроХ்роХ ро╡ро░ை роиீроЩ்роХ ропாро░ுроХ்роХுроо் роХுро▒ைроЮ்роЪро╡роЩ்роХ роЗро▓்ро▓ . роТро░ு роиாро│் роЙроЩ்роХ moment роЙроо் ро╡ро░ுроо் . рокிро▒рок...

Gandhi - A Myth

Criticising Gandhi for WhatsApp-generated reasons is considered sigma these days. Here is a list of reasons for which Gandhi gets criticised, and are these criticisms even true?   Non-violence is a sign of weakness                 I.           The young generation is fascinated by wars and revolutions, so it is easy for us to call the non-violence tactic ineffective, but if it was ineffective, why did Nelson Mandela and Luther King use these tactics in their successful respective protests later?               II.           Gandhi was a tactician, and he knew that nonviolence (NV) was an effective tool against a powerful British government that followed the rule of law in their day-to-day governance. However, if Gandhi had launched same nonviolent movements...

Diplomatic Drama: India vs. Canada - The Nijjar Assassination Allegations

Canadian PM Trudeau accuses Indian govt of killing a Khalistani in Canada and expelled an Indian diplomat. Relations going to be in deep freeze for the foreseeable future. If there was credible evidence, Trudeau would’ve stayed away from G20 summit. I mean that’s a way to show all is not well, like Xi did. But he attended. Now in matter of days he has credible evidence. Doesn’t add up. Putting India-Canada ties at risk for his political problems? Modi will be pleased with the accusation though. Taking out terrorist on foreign soil will be well received in India, which has suffered terribly to terrorism. The ties are important for both India & Canada. Jaishankar has another situation to handle. Accusation will be rejected. Tit-for-tat is kind of norm when it comes to expulsion of diplomats. Indian companies have invested CAD $6.6 billion, creating nearly 17,000 jobs in Canada Source : https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/indian-companies-invest-cad-6-6-billion-create-nearl...